After a bombshell French court ruling cleared two women of defamation for claiming Brigitte Macron was born male, the world turned to chaos — but it was the viral wager between Morgan and Owens that stole the spotlight. What began as media banter became a cultural flashpoint, with reputations, receipts, and six figures on the line.

In a spectacle that feels more like a scene from Family Guy than real life, Piers Morgan now finds himself on the hook for a $100,000 bet to Candace Owens — all stemming from one of the most controversial rumors to come out of French politics in years.

It began, as these things often do, with a fiery on-air exchange. Owens claimed that Brigitte Macron, First Lady of France and wife of President Emmanuel Macron, was not born a woman — a claim she doubled down on despite Morgan’s repeated demands for “proof.” The two media personalities ultimately escalated their spat into a formal wager: if Owens could substantiate her claim, Morgan would owe her $100,000. He even offered to donate the money to a charity of her choosing.

Now, following a French court ruling that cleared two women of defamation for asserting the same claim Owens promoted, the internet is demanding Morgan honor the bet.

The Court Case That Rocked Paris

The legal spark came from a lawsuit filed by Brigitte Macron against Amandine Roy, a clairvoyant, and journalist-blogger Natasha Rey. The two had produced a four-hour YouTube exposé alleging that Macron was born “Jean-Michel Trogneux,” a man who later transitioned.

Rather than dismissing the case outright, the Paris appeal court surprised many by ruling that the women’s statements did not constitute defamation. According to the court, their claims — while provocative — fell within the bounds of acceptable journalistic inquiry and were made “in good faith.” That ruling has been interpreted by many, including Owens, as a tacit green light to continue questioning the First Lady’s background.

Owens wasted no time declaring victory. “Where’s my money, Piers?” she asked, comparing herself to Stewie from Family Guy in the now-viral scene where he relentlessly hounds Brian for repayment. “Make it rain,” she said, referencing the agreed-upon sum — which, thanks to currency conversion, rounded out to $136,000 USD.

Morgan’s Response: Silence (So Far)

While Owens has kept the pressure on through social media and media appearances, Piers Morgan has yet to publicly acknowledge the court ruling — let alone the bet.

During their original exchange, Morgan was unrelenting in his defense of Macron, calling Owens’ accusations “deeply offensive” and “baseless.” Owens countered that she wasn’t the originator of the claim and pointed to a multi-year investigation conducted by French journalists, who allegedly faced interference from the Macron camp — including, she says, state security agents confiscating their devices.

“If this were false,” Owens argued, “why send in the secret service?”

The “Missing” Evidence

At the heart of the controversy lies a simple question: Where is the proof? Owens and her supporters claim that Macron has never provided early-life photos or public evidence of her brother, who some allege may not exist at all. They point to a lack of school records, no wedding photos from her first marriage, and an absence of documented childbirth — despite Macron’s claim of having given birth to three children.

Owens says the burden of proof isn’t high. “We’re not asking for a medical exam. Just school photos. A walk with your alleged brother. A hospital record. Anything.” So far, she says, none of that has materialized.

Critics argue that the entire line of questioning is invasive, conspiratorial, and cruel. Supporters frame it as legitimate inquiry — and now, according to the Paris court, legally permissible.

Media and Cultural Fallout

As the ruling spread, it sparked a firestorm on both sides of the Atlantic. In France, legacy outlets treaded cautiously, covering the story with legal caveats. In the U.S., however, conservative pundits like Owens celebrated the verdict as a win for “truth-tellers” standing up to powerful elites.

The controversy has also resurfaced scrutiny over Brigitte Macron’s relationship with the French President — particularly the fact that she was in her 40s and a teacher when Emmanuel Macron was a 15-year-old student. Critics have called the relationship predatory, a claim that has long dogged the couple but rarely received mainstream criticism.

The Question Now: Will Piers Pay?

With the court decision now public, Candace Owens and her fans are ramping up pressure on Morgan to honor his bet. “I’ll take another bet,” joked one commentator, “that he never pays her a dime.”

Whether Morgan sees this as a legal technicality or a personal loss remains to be seen. But what began as a fiery segment between two pundits has now become an international media circus — and a lesson in the unpredictable consequences of going all-in on public wagers.

One thing’s for sure: Candace Owens won’t stop until Piers pays up.

Written in a personal capacity. All views are based on public information and are not an endorsement of any claims presented.