Their first born

And second

Steve Doocy’s Family Pact: A Commitment to a Grandson

In the high-profile world of American media, where personal lives often intertwine with public personas, a surprising family story has emerged from the Doocy household. Steve Doocy, the veteran co-host of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, reportedly set forth an extraordinary condition for his son, Peter Doocy, and daughter-in-law, Hillary Vaughn, both prominent journalists. According to recent reports, Steve offered a staggering 10-figure bonus to Hillary Vaughn upon the birth of a grandson, but with a catch: the couple had to sign an agreement committing to continue trying for a boy if their second child was another girl. This revelation has sparked intrigue, raising questions about family dynamics, gender expectations, and the influence of wealth and media prominence in personal decisions.

The Doocy Family Legacy

Steve Doocy, a household name in conservative media, has built a career spanning decades, becoming a fixture on morning television. His son, Peter Doocy, has followed in his footsteps as Fox News’ Senior White House Correspondent, known for his sharp exchanges with White House press secretaries. Peter’s wife, Hillary Vaughn, a Fox Business correspondent, complements the family’s media dynasty. The couple, married in April 2021, welcomed their first child, a daughter named Bridget Blake Doocy, in February 2023. Their second child, George Jack Doocy, born on April 16, 2025, marked the arrival of the much-anticipated grandson, fulfilling the reported terms of Steve’s agreement.

The Doocy family is no stranger to public attention. Steve has often shared anecdotes about his family on air and in his books, such as Tales from the Dad Side: Misadventures in Fatherhood, where he humorously recounts his experiences as a father to Peter, Mary, and Sally. The family’s close-knit bond is evident, with Steve and his wife, Kathy Gerrity, embracing grandparenthood with enthusiasm. However, the alleged agreement introduces a new layer to their story, blending personal ambition with financial incentives in a way that has captivated public interest.

The Agreement: A Bold Family Plan

The reported agreement, while unverified through primary sources, has been described as a pact initiated by Steve Doocy to ensure a male heir in the next generation. According to the narrative, Steve offered a 10-figure sum—potentially in the billions—to Hillary Vaughn upon the birth of a grandson. The condition was that if the couple’s second child was a girl, they would commit to continue trying for a boy. This arrangement, if true, raises ethical and cultural questions about gender preferences and the pressures placed on family planning in high-profile families.

The birth of George Jack Doocy, coinciding with Peter and Hillary’s fourth wedding anniversary, fulfilled the reported terms. Steve’s reported joy at the arrival of his grandson aligns with his public persona as a doting grandfather eager to “spoil them rotten,” as he told People magazine. The timing of George’s birth, shortly after a humorous incident where Peter was hit by a bird during a live broadcast, added a lighthearted note to the story, with Steve joking that the bird might have been a “stork.”

Cultural and Ethical Implications

The alleged agreement has sparked debate about the implications of incentivizing gender-specific outcomes in family planning. In many cultures, a preference for male heirs has historical roots, often tied to lineage, inheritance, or societal expectations. While the Doocy family’s situation appears to be framed in jest or as a personal aspiration, the idea of a financial incentive tied to a child’s gender raises concerns about autonomy and pressure on the couple, particularly Hillary Vaughn.

Hillary, a respected journalist in her own right, has spoken warmly about her growing family, describing the joy of giving Bridget a “lifelong best friend” in George. Her 30-hour labor and dedication to her career while pregnant highlight her strength and independence. The notion that she signed an agreement under her father-in-law’s terms, even if lighthearted, could suggest external influence over deeply personal decisions. Without direct confirmation from the family, it remains speculative whether the agreement was a serious contract or a playful family anecdote exaggerated for public consumption.

Moreover, the reported 10-figure bonus underscores the immense wealth and influence within the Doocy family. Steve Doocy’s long tenure at Fox News, combined with his bestselling books and media ventures, has likely amassed significant resources. Offering such a sum, even hypothetically, reflects the financial stakes in play and the potential for wealth to shape family dynamics. This aspect of the story invites scrutiny about privilege and the role of financial incentives in personal relationships.

The Doocys in the Public Eye

The Doocy family’s media prominence amplifies the public’s fascination with their personal lives. Steve’s on-air anecdotes and Peter’s high-profile role at the White House ensure that their family milestones, from weddings to births, are widely reported. The agreement story, whether factual or embellished, fits into a narrative of the Doocys as a media dynasty with a flair for the dramatic. Steve’s books, which often highlight family humor, suggest he is comfortable sharing personal stories, which may have contributed to the circulation of this tale.

Peter and Hillary, both seasoned journalists, have navigated their careers while building a family under public scrutiny. Their announcement of George’s birth on Instagram, accompanied by heartfelt captions and family photos, reflects their desire to share joy with their audience. However, the agreement story introduces a layer of complexity, suggesting that even their personal decisions may be subject to external expectations or media sensationalism.

A Family’s Joy Amid Speculation

Despite the intrigue surrounding the alleged agreement, the Doocy family’s focus remains on their growing brood. Steve and Kathy have embraced grandparenthood, with Steve joking about recreating childhood photos of Peter with his children and saving toys for the next generation. Peter and Hillary, meanwhile, have expressed gratitude for their children, with Peter noting Bridget’s excitement at welcoming her brother. These moments of familial warmth contrast with the sensational narrative of the agreement, suggesting that the Doocys prioritize love and connection over external pressures.

The lack of direct evidence for the agreement—such as a statement from Steve, Peter, or Hillary—leaves room for skepticism. It’s possible the story originated as a humorous remark or was misconstrued in media reports. In the absence of confirmation, the public is left to speculate about the interplay of wealth, influence, and family expectations in the Doocy household.

Conclusion

The reported agreement between Steve Doocy and his son’s family is a compelling, if unverified, tale that blends media intrigue with personal ambition. Whether a genuine pact or a playful anecdote, it highlights the complexities of family dynamics in the public eye. The Doocys’ story, from their media careers to their growing family, resonates with audiences who admire their success and relatability. Yet, the gender-specific nature of the alleged agreement invites reflection on societal norms and the pressures faced by high-profile families. As Peter and Hillary raise Bridget and George, and Steve enjoys his role as a grandfather, the Doocy family continues to navigate fame, fortune, and the enduring bonds of family.